Regarding the very first day’s a test against a Norwalk police officer accused of intimately assaulting a 13-year-old woman, the alleged victim, now 20, took the witness stand and told the jury Anthony Santo stuck his hand down her jeans and touched her intimately while her daddy and sibling had been resting close to them.
Santo seemed on without feeling whilst the incident was described by the woman at state Superior Court in Stamford. Santo ended up being an 18-year member of the Norwalk Police Department before October of 2009 as he ended up being arrested on costs of second-degree intimate attack and danger of problems for a young child. He’s got been on unpaid leave that is administrative their arrest.
The alleged victim stated Santo had been a good friend associated with the household and invested lots of time at their residence in Greenwich. The girl stated she could inform Santo things she could maybe maybe not discuss along with her “strict parents” and described Santo as her “second daddy. “
The girl ended up being not able to identify the precise date of this attack, but stated she had been about 13 at that time. The witness stated she was at her pajamas sitting for a settee in her own family area and also the two might have been speaing frankly about masturbation or being groped by another child whenever Santo touched her. The lady said there might have been an electrical outage that night and her dad and bro was resting for a mattress within the family room whenever event were held.
Your ex stated she failed to inform anybody in regards to the incident until belated 2007, whenever she told her boyfriend.
At that time, your ex stated she had been therefore young she failed to realize something bad had happened, although she stated she instantly went into the restroom to gather by herself.
“I did not determine what was taking place, I didn’t comprehend the emotions I happened to be that is having did not understand it absolutely was incorrect decisive link. I did not know any thing, ” she stated.
Prior to the lady and Santo had been to just take a vacation together to Florida to check out a member of family of Santo’s in July 2009, the boyfriend called authorities and reported the intimate attack she described to him a lot more than a year previously.
Santo, who has got remained free on $25,000 relationship since his arrest, would sometimes lean in to communicate with his lawyer, Gary Mastronardi, during the roughly 90 mins of testimony the lady provided each morning.
Moments after Mastronardi started their cross assessment, the lady started to cry after she made the allegation against Santo, a close friend as she was asked in a stern tone why her father was angry with her.
“He had been upset he did not believe you with you because. He did not believe your tale, ” Mastronardi said.
Judge Richard Comerford then provided your ex minutes that are several write herself before continuing.
Whenever Mastronardi started once again, he asked to truly have the exact same concern duplicated, but an objection to a follow-up led Comerford to clear the jury through the courtroom.
Right before meal, Mastronardi outlined their strategy during an argument with senior Assistant State’s Attorney Maureen Ornousky about how exactly far to the woman’s dating back ground he could be in a position to go while protecting Santo.
Mastronardi stated he wished to phone witnesses to buttress their concept that the lady had made up the story in regards to the intimate attack to make her boyfriend jealous.
“My place is she managed to make it up. I am maybe perhaps maybe not attempting to soil her reputation, ” stated Mastronardi, incorporating that by participating in this bid for envy, she dragged an innocent individual as a criminal cost.
Mastronardi said while attempting to alert the authorities from the instance, perhaps the woman’s daddy stated the jealous boyfriend “plugged Tony Santo involved with it. “
Mastronardi stated the lady had composed another severe allegation that is sexual another individual, but authorities decided on never to prosecute the so-called perpetrator of the intimate assault considering that the story was so bizarre it may never be thought.
More witnesses will likely be called in the event anticipated to take the remaining portion of the week to determine.